Saturday, December 12, 2009
"All the Afternoons in the World"
Monday, December 7, 2009
Something to be excited about?
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
I'm a Craigslist Elitist
Friday, November 27, 2009
Montréal!
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
What I'm Craving Now


Exhibit B: Green, One-shoulder Georgette Dress.

Again, I'm not sure why but I'm really into one-shoulder dresses right now, despite the fact that they're pretty Occasion-with-a-capital-O-y. I thought about getting one for Jo's wedding but my beauteous yellow eyelet lace dress was preferable, squee, though I'm still in debt for it. Note to self: must wear that again to bring down price-per-wear.
Anyway. Wouldn't this green one-shoulder with a ruffle look great over black tights and sort-of chunky black high heels? Perhaps with a belt and a long, Joan-from-Mad-Men style necklace? $45 at Overstock.
Exhibit C: Stainless Steel, Blue-and-Goldtone Nautica Chronograph Watch.

I really need a watch. I've been needing one since I started my current job, oh, almost 2 years ago. As it is I run meetings by surreptitiously checking my cell phone, which sort of makes it look like I'm trying to text someone. Awesome.
Anyway, this will not be the watch I'm getting. While I think it's quite lovely in a structured, masculine way, I probably need something more ... basic. Like straight-up silver or gold. This is $120 (from $290) at Overstock. It also comes in black and white (... which I'm considering slightly more seriously) for $105 (from $210).
Exhibit D: Vintage Tourmaline & Diamond Ring.

Yeah ... this one is a total nonessential. But recently I've been getting into vintage or vintage-styled jewelry, where the settings and cuts seem a little more old-school (like rose-cut diamonds? Love them). Plus I've always loved big statement rings.
I like that the stone in this ring is a tourmaline, too, and the slightly watery color it has. I feel like emeralds are either deeper and more vivid (the good-quality ones), or paler and cloudier (poorer quality). This has the paler color I like, but retains the gem's clarity. And don't you think it would be a kind of fun engagement ring? (NOT THAT I AM THINKING ABOUT THAT SO DON'T EVEN GO THERE IN COMMENTS, for real y'all, I'm really not, because I'm not effing insane.) I think I always see vintage rings with a large center stone and associate them with antique engagement rings, since in the old days (pre-de Beers) an engagement ring was any kind of gem, not just a diamond. I always remember how in the Little House on the Prairie books, Laura's engagement ring from Almanzo was a small gold band, set with a garnet surrounded by two little pearls. She wore it on her index finger ... so basically it was a cocktail ring, haha.
I also always think that the only time I'm likely to receive/purchase a piece of jewelry with a big, expensive stone is when/if I ever get engaged ... hence when I see big rings I covet, I'm all "engagement ring!" Anyway. Protesting too much? I realize it looks like it could be paste, but it's real, and $2,000 at Overstock's estate jewelry site.
In my ideal world I would buy all of these items and possibly wear them all at once (dress + tights + heels + biker jacket = win!), probably minus the watch, but instead I'm going to buy myself ... applications to law school! Awesome. And just as durable, I'm sure.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Birthday Gift
Monday, June 29, 2009
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Wakes in the Sea
Friday, June 5, 2009
Taking the LSAT is Like Going Through Airport Security, Except that They Actually Enforce Regulations
This Weekend
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
The Real World
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Materialism
Though they might not be the most, um, practical "watches" I cuold be choosing. There are sure a lot of air quotes in this post.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Ok, I am woman enough to admit when I am wrong ...
Leighton Meester, I wish I was you. Weird name and all.
2. Platform heels. I still maintain that some of them make you look like a hooker. See exhibit A:

I'm sorry, I just can't get on board this $120.00 BCBG train.
However, these:
These are still a little strangely baggy in the crotch/waist and I am anti-ripping, but I like that you can see a tad more ankle and calf, and with a heel I think that can be pretty. So OK. Basically I'm just prepping you to say that I might roll some of my jeans this summer, MAYBE. (p.s. I have pair that I 'cuff' because they're too long to wear with flats, but I don't consider that rolling, just laziness/miserliness as I refuse to buy another pair with inseams of the correct length.)
And to round it off, current trends I love:
1. Maxidresses. Thank you, gods of fashion, for bringing this comfy clothing option back into play. The printed maxi below is like 14 kinds of cute, and brings the ability to pretend I'm comfortable in revealing, summery clothes while not actually revealing anything at all. Woo hoo!
2. Flats. Praise the gods. I love a heel as much as the next girl but it is nice to know that I can give my feet a break while not diving into frumpy-mom territory. These are cute, right? Nothing special but sweet and easy.
3. Metallics. In moderation, I do so love a good metallic--a shoe, clutch, or belt in a gold or bronze is just super pretty, and pretty safe. It's easier to get in trouble with larger swathes of metallic, but I have also seen some gorgeous minidresses, tunics, and shifts in dull or muted metallics that make me drool. (No pic, it's making my post all wonky when I try to import one.)
However, I will never get on board with these trends:
1. Super, super distressed jeans. Or anything with paint flecks. Seriously, why would I pay to look like I'e owned clothes for 4 years and painted my house in them?
2. Shoulder pads. Please no.
3. Those ridiculous peep-toe boots that came out last fall, and current their summer inverse: sandals with, like, random extra fabric wrapped around the ankle.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Does Not Compute.
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Foods I Couldn't Do Without
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Awesome!
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Three Weekends Ago In SF
Then we went to In 'N Out. Delicious!
After that, we went into SF and went to Chinatown, natch. Here's me and mom, and another of your typical tourist-Chinatown street.
One of SF's famous cable cars. Jarrett explained to us the next day how trolleys, cable cars, and street cars differ -- SF has streetcars which run off electricity pulled from cables running above the street, but which have tires and no set tracks. It also has several actual trolleys that similarly pull electricity from the overhead cable, but ALSO run on actual trolley tracks (this is what a SEPTA trolley does). Apparently the term trolley can mean different things in different places. However, SF's is, I think, the last/the only US place with an actual cable car still in use. With cable cars, there's a cable running under the street itself that's always moving. The car is on tracks above it, and the conductor literally grabs the moving cable (uh with part of the car, obvs) and the car is hauled along as the cable moves. To stop, he just presses the button to let go.
After this, we walked from Chinatown to the Fisherman's Wharf, and everybody was cranky because apparently people who don't walk as much as NYers get cranky about walking as much as NYers. Oops. I told them it was a long walk ...
At Fisherman's Wharf is the famous Ghirardelli factory. I am saddened to tell you that this trip, right then, was when I finally admitted after 25 years that my mother does not know how to pronounce Ghirardelli, and thus I have been pronouncing it wrong this whole time too. And I do mean this whole time; I remember knowing what Ghirardelli and Godiva were at a pretty young age since my mom was sort of a chocolate snob (she was always like "oh, Hershey, I'd rather eat chalk" and I'm like "did they even have chocolate in hong kong when you were growing up?"). Anyway I feel like I only hear the word pronounced aloud like once every year, and for some reason for the last 8 or so I've just been ... ignoring the gathering evidence that both my mom and myself were making fools of ourselves. Oh well. It's delicious either way.
The next day we went down to Monterey Bay, which is a few hours south of SF, on the coast. I'm not posting too many pix bc ... that's boring and takes forever, but here are a few.
This is of the wharf near the Monterey Bay Aquarium, which is pretty famous (though not exactly inexpensive).
The aquarium itself was really good, though. They had pretty wide-ranging, well-designed, and informative exhibits, many of which were also startlingly beautiful. Consider these strangely luminous, orange-streaked jellyfish:
Or the gorgeous way the sunlight filters through this kelp forest. The kelp forest was very large and had a huge variety of fish. My camera is a point-and-shoot and couldn't adequately capture how a school of fish would dart by in a streak of silver light. It was every cliche you'd expect -- tranquil, beautiful, etc -- but cliches are cliches for a reason, I guess.
We drove farther down the Monterey coast. This is the beginning of Big Sur, an area sixty miles long down the coast, characterized by its plunging cliffs and colorful hills. It reminded me of the heath/moor on the coast of Ireland.
The next day, we crossed the Golden Gate Bridge (back up in SF, going across the bay) ...
... towards Muir Beach, where there were many happy doggies running in the surf, and Muir Woods. We only got to stay in Muir Woods for 45 minutes (on the dot, because there is absolutely no parking there and my brother ended up staying the car and essentially just driving around the mountain while he waited for us), but it was pretty cool. I'd love to go back and hike some of the paths; in 45 minutes, you can basically only go down the 30-min tourist loop (esp if you are dragging a mom and aunt).
The trees, they iz big. The people, they iz little.
Lastly, we went to Sausalito, a 'quaint' (read: once local, now touristy) town next to the water across the bay from SF. We had a delicious dinner and I had a lovely beer. Mmm.
This is a pic of SF from Sausalito. It ... didn't come out well. Sorry.
Anyway, it was fun, but I really want to go back and make a proper coastal trip of it with my two HS friends this summer when we're in LA for my other friend Karen's wedding. We're not sure it will work out, but I hope so!
OK that's all. To come, hopefully soon: some NY pictures!



